Physical Security Professional Certification Practice Exam 2025 – Comprehensive Prep Guide

Question: 1 / 400

In legal terms, competent evidence is admissible if what condition is met?

A witness heard of an event on the news and knows someone involved

A witness researches an event from a media story

A witness has had a similar experience

A witness can demonstrate competency to the trial judge regarding the evidence

Competent evidence is deemed admissible in legal terms when a witness can demonstrate their competency to the trial judge regarding the evidence they provide. This means the witness must show that they have the necessary qualifications, knowledge, or experience to testify about the matter at hand. Competency can include understanding the facts, being able to recall or express them accurately, and having an appropriate basis for their testimony, which could stem from personal experience, education, or specialized training.

The other options do not sufficiently establish a witness's competency. For example, simply hearing about an event through news media does not provide a reliable basis for testimony; it lacks direct knowledge and accountability. Researching an event through media stories similarly does not equate to firsthand experience or knowledge, making it less reliable. Lastly, having a similar experience may give some context but does not inherently demonstrate competency regarding the specific evidence involved in the case. Thus, the requirement of demonstrating competency to the trial judge ensures that only credible and reliable evidence is presented and evaluated in legal proceedings.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta
Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy